Musings of a ‘Fever’-ish Mind
(Body temperature presently a little over 99 degrees)
This is the first installment comprising some of the perspectives of the serious side of life. Due to the change in the style of the written word, it can be considered equivalent to an attempt to venture into yet-unexplored and dangerous ground, especially considering the sensitive nature of the very first issue at hand. Before I really begin, let me just put in a few clauses:
- These are the authors personal opinions and bear very close resemblance to ground reality as perceived by him, but feel free to differ and express in politically correct terms exclusively (read “this is ‘my’ blog!”
- Please restrain physical assault on the author with weapons equal to or less destructive than soft bound light-weight books or equivalent paper bundles, below neck level and above waist level, and targeted for temporary damage only (temporary defined as less than five minutes injury)
Now that we have the basic ground rules in place, let’s set the ball rolling. The very beginning, and hopefully not the very end, is with a subject that tends to confuse at least half the world (the male half, to say the least), and the referee too (read GOD), as history stands witness: WOMEN! So how do we really classify this species, so special that neither can we (males) live with them nor without them, within reasonably perceivable bounds?
Women are complex. Complex is a synonym for life. Life is short. Short is sweet. This naturally leads us to the conclusion that women are sweet! Wait a sec! (This can be fully attributed to the fingers on the keyboard outrunning the mind!) Anyways, so shall it be.
Moving on from the primary comprehension of the species at hand, let’s delve a little further into why this species complicates life to such a great extent. It is undeniable that, at least in the Indian context (if not globally), males are highly dependent on women for many a survival tasks. This dependency creates a need, and hence the resulting failure, to understand the behavior of this particular species; after all, it’s a matter of survival! Consider the following behavioral patterns to comprehend the depth of the matter:
- The spoken word is never consistent in its meaning and is highly dependent of the context of the conversation, the particular instance of the species at hand, the subject, the time and the timing, the tone, the mood and innumerable other factors that would in itself take a lifetime to recollect
- The same pattern can be seen for the “look”, the particular way in which the head is tilted, or the eyes that reflect the gravity of the happenings inside the mind of the species, and is eventually left to be perceived by the male counterpart on the basis of his past experience or naivety, resulting in ‘mirages of perceptions’ leading to physical damage to the male specimen, however temporary or permanent the damage may be
- ‘Bitch’ing, as the word goes! About whom, when, to achieve what ends and for pleasure or purpose, probably very few of the species itself really understand the complexity of the process but choose to indulge in it endlessly (though I would certainly not deny that it is highly entertaining and indulged equally by their male counterparts, even though the origin of the word can probably never be attributed to them (for further clarifications, the word itself stands testimony to its origins))
The aforementioned behavioral traits are just few of the many that characterize typically this interesting species. At this juncture, two particular specimens of the species in discussion gratefully previewed the content penned till now, and the following discussion with them led to the discovery of some further interesting traits.
- This species suffers from a serious syndrome of “selective perception”, as the first specimen ‘Miss Read’ “temporary defined as less than five MINUTES injury” (previously mentioned) as “temporary defined as less than five MONTHS injury”. It seems that not only is time circular in nature for them (consider the minutes (‘Miss Read’ as DECADES) spent on cellular networking), but is also a proof of their contorted thirst-for-domination over the poor-and-helpless male species (and then they call it a man’s world!). As further proof, I shall quote from a street sign (seen close to Punjabi Bagh, just in case you doubt my credibility, or laud my innovative genius) targeted at supporting the male: “Man Help: Call 9********. Agar biwi pareshaan kare to jald call Karen” (Read: Call urgently if wife troubles you!). Add to it their polite touch of sarcasm intermingled with the sweet but poison-deadly honey-dripping melting-warm razor-sharp sideway glances!
- Coming to the second specimen, it seems that due to a ‘two-second’ read through half the article, she got confused as to its indications (which factually speaking, seem to be rather well directed in nature). This takes the toll of the “confused” now to exactly half the world (the male half) plus ONE (according to present estimates). This provides a clear indication to the following two aspects: the first reinforces the previous “selective perception” syndrome, and the second that it is very elementary to confuse simple-hearted specimens of this species, even though it is the same species which in general dissects every sentence uttered by their counterparts to the last letter, drawing conclusions from it which seem bizarre and unimaginable to even the most complex male minds on the face of this earth.
Now that we have dealt in-depth with the behavioral traits peculiar to this species, we confront the dilemma which nearly every male species faces on a day-to-day basis: How does one communicate effectively with their kind in order to generate a response which resembles (even remotely, if nothing more) the one we desire to have (and without the risk of every trace of one of our kind being removed from the face of this earth, for each response!)?
If only we were to learn from our mistakes, it would have been evident that it is the species itself which provides the answer to most of the questions we fail to comprehend. On closer examination, the crucial bits of information can be found in the spoken words of the specimen itself, in general. Although I agree with heart and soul that not only do women beat around the bush, but they also beat around the neighbor’s bush, his whole garden, his neighbor’s garden and so on till the end of the lane, and even then there exists a fair chance that they may not reveal that crucial bit of information (however inconsequential or unworthy it may be! (and it is a fairly decent chance, on second thoughts)). Even though this scenario sounds grim, if one has the patience (read: is stupid enough) to play the waiting game, and actually manages to survive the test of time, the information received can be pretty useful at the right time and place, though depending wholly on the skills of the possessor of that particular valuable. It can provide probing insights into how to stimulate the specimen to respond as desired, with highly favourable consequences! Though a word of extreme caution is also deemed to be necessary (just for the over-enthusiastic practitioners of hot-on-the-block get-your-woman-going mantras): Repeated attempts with low success rates will only get you up against the wall, and further persistence will only add to the number of years the particularly foolish male specimen will suffer from being a “single” one (refer the author’s plight!)! On the other hand, let us consider the cost of letting go that particular jewel, a number of instances of whose kind will pass the male by, as the male in discussion chooses not to try and search for those few needles in the haystack. It’s like trying to build a sky-scraper of a relationship having in place a foundation with every alternate stone missing (and there being no intention to fill the same). Reasonable, but certainly does not sound sustainable! Therefore, we now arrive at the dilemma of get-it-or-leave-it, one which has subconsciously troubled our great grandfathers from times prehistoric. It is for this that I will not put forward a solution, as that would defy the whole purpose of keeping you going through sheets and sheets of random bawling over spilt milk. It is now that each male specimen facing this particular dilemma must make his choice, being very situation-specific (and it is this very clause that will probably save the author’s life from repercussions of yet-unknown varieties and untested kinds from specimens of either species, depending on who reads or miss-reads it by what margins!). After all, what’s the point of having a story if the punch-line spells out in crystal clear words the what-to-dos and what-not-to-dos (give me one good reason why, just why, would even the biggest nit-wit bother reading the darned story if all that mattered was the last line)! The choice is now yours; it might just be the last one! Handle with care!!